Of Adrian Beltre, Michael Young and Conspiracy Theories

Are the covert Rangers really interested in free agent third baseman Adrian Beltre and have sinister plans for Michael Young?

Or are they just staying around the periphery long enough to drive up the price at the expense of the Angels. The Red Sox like doing that to the Yankees so maybe the Rangers have been taking notes.

adrian-beltre.jpgOr is Beltre’s agent, Scott Boras, just trying to make people think the Rangers are in after Beltre so he can extract the biggest contract possible out of the Angels. After almost three decades of doing this, Boras knows how to play this game better than anybody.

Or maybe the Rangers – now in their “Run Silent, Run Deep” mode – are trying to make Vladimir Guerrero believe that they have other options at designated hitter if he is not inclined to take their one-year contract offer.

Maybe Guerrero is up at the Grand Slam Gift Shop at the Ballpark in Arlington, where they sell hats from every Major League team. Maybe he is trying them all on, one by one, to see which one fits.

So many conspiracy theories to ponder while somewhere pitchers Arthur Rhodes and Brandon Webb are presumably taking physicals in preparation for the Rangers actually admitting that they have signed both of them.

Of course if they did that, the Rangers would also have to admit they have found spots for them on a 40-man roster that is jammed pack at the moment after the signing of Yoshinori Tateyama and selecting Mason Tobin in the Rule 5 Draft. Currently there is no room at the inn, to stay in the current holiday vernacular.

The Rangers have gone quiet during the post-holiday lull but there could be bombshells lurking somewhere, ready to come flying out of the bunker at any moment.

Back to Beltre for the moment.

The Angels are interested. The Athletics are interested, but keep dropping out, according to reports. The Rangers may be interested, depending on who you believe and what wildfire rumor actually has substance.

It was exactly two years ago at this time that the Rangers had quietly put in motion the plan to move Michael Young to third base and install Elvis Andrus at shortstop. That bombshell finally exploded just after the New Years.

So presumably if the Rangers are truly interested in Beltre, then that would presumably mean they have ulterior plans for Young. The scotch-fueled rumors at the Winter Meetings suggested the Rangers were trying to trade him, which club officials either downplayed or denied altogether. But wildfire fire fighters they are not.

Nobody on the Rangers has ever actually denied they don’t like Beltre. They do. They just don’t seem to be keen on paying him $70 million over five years. Or five years at $85 million.


Michael%20Young.jpgSomebody must think that Beltre will be closer to the third baseman that hit .321 with 28 home runs and 102 RBI for the Red Sox last year and far away from the guy who hit .265 with eight home runs and 44 RBI for the Mariners in 2009.

The Angels supposedly offered five years at $70 million. Now there are rumblings that the Rangers have made a similar offer, plus thrown in an option year. What’s wrong with five years for a third baseman who has been over .500 in slugging and .360 in on-base percentage just twice in 13 seasons. Must be the glove.

But if the Rangers have offered that and Beltre accepted, he and Young would be making a combined $30 million for a third base/designated hitter combination. That would be over 30 percent of the Rangers payroll.

With Beltre as the third baseman and Young as the designated hitter. Beltre isn’t going anywhere to just take four hacks a game while riding the stationary bicycle in the clubhouse while his team is on defense. Word is though he likes Texas even though his home is in Southern California.

Maybe the Rangers move Young to first base. They could trade him but they would have to pick up a significant portion of his $16 million per year salary, which still has three years to run. Surely the Rangers new ownership group isn’t that flush with money no matter how many baseball caps they are selling at the Grand Slam Gift Shop.

At the Winter Meetings, club officials didn’t like the idea of signing Beltre and moving Young to first. They liked Mitch Moreland. They also said they liked Beltre but didn’t like the money it would take to sign him.

That was then, this is now. That was when they were in the running for Cliff Lee and worried that Brandon Webb faced significant odds in overcoming two years of shoulder problems.

Now Webb and 41-year-old reliever Arthur Rhodes are on board. Supposedly, although there is still no superfluous press release in hand yet. Physicals are still pending.

Webb’s shoulder issues are well-documented. Rhodes pitched through a nagging foot injury – plantar fascititis – for part of last season. It is possible the Rangers are not rushing to judgment on either player.

Or they are working on some blockbuster trade to open up room on the 40-man roster. Or still trying to get players through waivers during this post-holiday lull.

Maybe the Rangers are cooking up plans to honor Rafael Palmeiro, Juan Gonzalez and Kevin Brown at their Mid-Winter banquet just in case they are elected to the Hall of Fame next week.

So many conspiracy theories to digest during the post-holiday lull.

 

8 Comments

Lets not forget that Beltre almost fought his own teamate in Boston last season for “touching” his head after a hr. This guy is not good enough to hack off your team leader and bring a volitle personality into the clubhouse, and I (as a long time Ranger fan) just do not like the guy. I think it would be a terrible idea for the Rangers and I think it would hurt their post season chances , not help them. But that is just me.
http://rangerfandieter.mlblogs.com/

I guess it comes down to your expectations of what Beltre brings to the table. If you?re expecting a middle of the order bat, then you?re probably going to be disappointed. He?s had two stellar years offensively. The rest of the time, he?s a difference making defender with a league average bat. Is a 6 hole type hitter who improves your defense, and, by extension, your pitching staff worth 14 million for 5 years? That?s a tough call, especially when you?re going to try to re-signing CJ Wilson and Josh Hamilton sometime soon.
I think Mike Hindman described the Angels/Rangers/Beltre/Guerrero/Young situation best as a ?weird game of chicken?.

I?ve heard Beltre?s not a good clubhouse guy, but as far as the hair thing, that?s pretty simple. It?s known that if you touch his head, he?s probably going to swing on you. Don?t poke the bear.

Here’s hoping the Rangers are just trying to drive up the price for the Angels. This guy is the model of inconsistency. Why anyone would offer Beltre any more than a 1-year contract is beyond me, since he only performs in his contract year. Resigning Vlad, a far better player and clubhouse presence, for just one or two years is much more in the team’s interest both short-term and for the long-term.

Beltre, Beltre, Beltre… The gang already has 2 Beltres (Omar and Engel), but one’s a L/L OF and one’s a RHP so there should be room for an IF.

But, not this one. He lied when he took the Dodgers’ money then bolted for Seattle when he was finally, actually eligible for a contract. He played great defense, but his offense in Seattle was really iffy – especially at home where the home field was not very good to hitters and from where a significant challenge to the Rangers’ Title may come. He won’t help much up there…

And, he’s volatile. We already had that when we had Uncle Milty and we ditched him. Why’d we want his twin brother?

MY is a pretty sorry 3B, but he always gets better the year following questions about his ability. And, his arm is superior to most 3B in both strength and accuracy. If he’d learn to put himself IN FRONT of those grounders instead of taking them “matador-style”, he’d be ten times the better defender and not so many balls would go bounding past him.

Let’s stay with MY at least another year… shoot, he might even win another GG! BBWAA has no clue there, so he could conceivably sneak away with another one… nyuk, nyuk!

Lets do the math. We are on the books for $48 million over three years for Young who is getting older and # 1 doesn’t hit for enough power for a three bagger, # 2 or field his position well enough as a three bagger. If the Rangers do what they have HISTORICALLY always done, i.e. dump player salaries and favorite players then Young gets traded. The Rangers pick up 1/2 of the 48 million which is 24 million saved. You turn around and give Vladdy a 2 year 24 million $ deal and go out and get Beltre for 75 million which is 15 million per year. If the Rangers sign Beltre, Young is gone, just based on what the Rangers have always done. I personally would like to see Young go back to second base and move Kinsler to third or to the outfield. If i were king, then i would tell Young, look re-negotiate your contract if you want to stay here. The signing of Young at that contract was #1 a political move and #2 was way too much money for him. I like Young, but he has priced himself off this team. I would like to see all the large $$$$ spent on good pitching, then on the star players like Hamilton and Cruz to keep from losing them. You keep hearing about how Young is the face of the franchise and we can’t deal him. Well Harrah, Perry, Sundberg, Bell, Gonzalezs and Rodriguez were all once the faces of the Rangers Franchise. What happened to them??????

Paul Molitor didn’t have the power to play 3B, either. And, he went on to the HoF after his career was over. And, he had to be moved from 3B to DH.

MY is pretty much equivalent to PM both as a player and as a clubhouse presence. Would you kick Molitor off your team?

MY’s career numbers (11 seasons) compare almost identically (21 seasons) pro-rated against Molitor. Paul had a few more 3Bs while MY has more games played.

My guess? The Rangers made a calculated choice to lock MY up and they’ll either keep him at 3B or they’ll move him to DH and allow him to back up the other 3 positions (possibly even 1B) where he has already proven capable. Molitor played 3B (and a very little 1B) period. MY’s flexibility actually makes him superior to Molitor.

Keeping MY at his current pace would insure another Ranger HoFer. Go, MY!

And what do you mean by the extension of Michael Young’s contract being a political move? What does that mean? I defy you to say in the open what you’re inferring…What was it that you called Hispanics 3 years ago????

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 24,178 other followers